日韩欧洲精品无码AV,99国产午夜精品一区二区天美,精品久久免费一区二区三区四区,久久综合图区亚洲综合图区,久久久久亚洲AV免费观看,精子网久久国产精品,亚洲AⅤ无码一区二区二三区性色,亚洲精品国产电影,亚洲资源在线观看,婷婷五月丁香在线

  • 
    
  • <ul id="yy6ca"></ul>
  • <del id="yy6ca"></del>
    <ul id="yy6ca"></ul>
    <strike id="yy6ca"><menu id="yy6ca"></menu></strike>
    Hotline:400-880-1556

    English




    Notice! IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission issued a number of interim resolutions on battery CTL

    Author:中認(rèn)聯(lián)科 time:2021-09-29 Ctr:1152

    On September 14, 2021, the IECEE International Electrotechnical Commission announced the latest CTL agreement on batteries. The three battery CTL interim resolutions released this time are as follows:

    01 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2182: Charging cut-off current

    PDSH 2182.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133-2:2017 clause 7.1.2, the second charging procedure prepared for the test project requires a charging cut-off current of 0.05 It A. When the battery manufacturer defines different charging cut-off currents, which cut-off battery should be used to set the charging conditions?

    Answer: 0.05It A should continue to be used.

    However, according to the manufacturer's requirements, a set of separate tests can be performed on samples prepared using the manufacturer's defined cut-off current for reference. When charging with the cut-off current specified by the manufacturer, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded.

    explain:

    The charge cut-off current has a great probability of affecting the charging state of the sample and the compliance of the test. Therefore, the value 0.05ItA defined in the standard should be strictly followed. On the other hand, considering that the charge cut-off current designed by the battery manufacturer for its products may be different to reflect the expected use conditions, it is allowed to set separately except for 0.05 ItA. The test of the charge cut-off current is for reference only. According to section 7.1.2, the upper limit voltage of the battery must not be exceeded, regardless of the charge cut-off current value.

    02 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 2161: Sample

    PDSH 2161.png

    Question: According to IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017 Clause 6, when evaluating batteries (packs), does the battery cell manufacturing time in the samples require no more than six months?

    Answer: Not required.

    explain:

    IEC SC21A WG4 confirmed that it plans to delete the sample requirement six months ago in the next edition of IEC 62133-2.

    Related topics:

    Q1: If the battery cell has not been tested separately, it will be sent together with the battery (pack) for evaluation and CB certification. In this case, can the battery manufacturing time be exempted?

    A: In this case, a separate full set of tests are required for the batteries, which is suitable for the requirement that the manufacturing time of the batteries cannot exceed six months.

    Q2: What needs to be paid attention to when applying for CB certification for battery (package) manufacturers in cross-border supply chains?

    A: The cycle of designing and producing batteries (packs) using cross-border purchased batteries may be longer. When the batteries (packs) are made, the battery manufacturing time may have exceeded six months. It is recommended that the cell manufacturer complete the CB certification in advance and provide cell samples and CB certificates. When the battery (pack) manufacturer subsequently performs the battery (pack) CB certification, it does not need to consider the issue of the cell manufacturing time exceeding six months.

    Q3: The battery (pack) that has obtained the CB certificate and report needs to be forwarded to other mark certification based on the CB certificate and report. Is the (temporary) decision also accepted?

    A: Based on the existing CB certificate and report transfer, it is based on the acceptance of the IEC standard and its CTL (temporary) resolution. However, it is not ruled out that the issuing agencies of different countries or regions have differentiated practices or requirements to issue their own marks.

    Q4: Regarding the content of this interim resolution, will you consider directly revising the standard in the future?

    A: The IEC SC21A working group WG4 plans to cancel the six-month sample requirement in the next edition of the 1.1 edition of IEC 62133-2.

    03 CTL Interim Resolution

    PDSH 1037A: Selection of series battery samples

    PDSH 1037A.png

    Sampling principles for battery series testing:

    This interim resolution expanded the battery standards applicable to the original resolution (No. DSH 1037) to include IEC 62133:2002, IEC 62133:2012, IEC 62133-1:2017, IEC 62133-2:2017, IEC 62619:2017 and IEC 62660 -3:2016. In order to facilitate a better understanding, some text adjustments have been made to the content of this resolution.

    Question: If a series of batteries of the same size, chemical system, voltage, and capacity are produced by the same manufacturer, if the safety compliance of the entire series is to be verified, which model should be selected for testing?

    Answer: In the above example, when the total capacity difference exceeds 20%, start from the highest capacity and calculate the capacity value with an amount lower than 20% of this value. Select those models in the series whose capacity is closest to the calculated value for testing. If the total capacity difference of a series of batteries does not exceed 20%, select the lowest, highest and closest model in the middle of the series for testing. Changes that may cause any test failure shall be considered as new models and shall be subjected to the required tests.

    explain:

    The type of change that may be considered different from the test type, which may cause any test results to fail, which may include but is not limited to:

    (a) The material of the positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte has changed;

    (b) Changes in protection devices, including hardware and software;

    (c) Changes in the safety design of battery cells or battery packs, such as exhaust valves;

    (d) Changes in the number of cells that make up; and

    (e) The change of the connection mode of the battery cell assembly.

    Related topics:

    Q1: In response to the requirements of different OEMs, manufacturers need to design soft-packed and square-shaped hard-shell batteries, and their electrical parameters are exactly the same. Can they be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: Considering that the physical structure of the soft case and the square hard case battery is quite different, and the difference directly affects the related test results and judgments, it needs to be considered as two independent battery projects.

    Q2: When there are differences in specific aspects, the battery cannot be tested and certified as a single model or series?

    A: The original resolution (No. DSH 1037) standardizes the specific sampling principles. At the same time, it standardizes the main factors that affect the series judgment. If there are the following differences, they are generally not treated as series:

    (1) Difference in size

    (2) Differences in chemical substances

    (3) Difference in voltage

    (4) Differences in materials of positive electrode, negative electrode, separator or electrolyte

    (5) Differences in protection devices, including hardware and software

    (6) Safety design differences of batteries or batteries, such as bleed valves

    (7) Cells in series and parallel connection and their number differences, or

    (8) Differences in battery cell connection methods.

    Based on the strictness of the above specifications and the dangerousness of the battery, during actual testing and certification, the battery is basically a single model.

    Related terms:

    IECEE  International Electrotechnical Commission Conformity Assessment Scheme System

    NCB  National Certification Body

    IEC SC21A  IEC Battery Technical Committee

    WG4  IEC Battery Technical Committee Portable Battery Working Group

    CTL  Testing Laboratory Committee

    ETF13  Battery Expert Working Group

    DSH  resolution

    PDSH  Interim Resolution

    Reminder

    Under certain specific circumstances, the IEC standard needs to make necessary elaboration, specification or further clarification, and form a CTL (temporary) resolution when necessary. It is recommended that you fully understand and implement the battery IEC standard and CTL (temporary) resolution based on the above discussion.

    ZRLK has focused on battery product testing and certification for 15 years, always paying attention to changes in national laws and regulations, and providing customers with one-stop testing and certification services to ensure that your products quickly enter the target market. If you have batteries and battery-containing consumer smart products that need to be tested and certified, please feel free to contact us, our engineers will serve you as soon as possible!

    Related Articles
    • How do smart desk lamps pass CE certification? ZRLK is your escort

    • Sodium battery UN38.3 certification: a key link to ensure product safety and compliance

    • CCC certification points of large capacity charging box: battery, headphones can not be less

    • CCC certification of the earphone charging case: The rated capacity of the battery cell is less than 600mAh.

    Follow Us
    国语自产偷拍精品视频偷最新| 欧美又黄又粗又爽免费看| 国产亚洲精品无码成人九色大鲁大| 国产伦理一区二区| 久久毛片免费看一区二区三区| 美女内射毛片在线看3d| 国精产品一品二品国精品69xx| 在线观看a级片| 欧美高大丰满freesex| 亚洲成av人在线视| 亚洲国产成人久久无码| 国产三级在线免费观看| 国产精品无码专区在线观看| 日韩一区二区在线观看| 亚洲福利一区二区| 国产精品一级av| 里番本子纯肉侵犯肉全彩无码| 精品黑人一区二区三区| 被黑人高潮喷水喷白浆| 国产乱子伦精品无码专区| 无遮挡粉嫩小泬久久久久久久| 精品一久久香蕉国产线看观看 | 玩弄放荡人妻少妇系列视频| 国内揄拍国内精品少妇国语| 精品少妇ay一区二区三区| 精品一区二区三区在线播放视频| 亚洲理论电影在线观看| 91成人免费| 日韩免费在线视频| 日韩人妻无码精品专区综合网| 中国和亚洲系列av| 在线精品一区二区三区| 日本伦理电影在线观看| 日韩精品久久久久久免费| 四虎影视一区二区精品| 欧美最大胆的西西人体44| 日韩性爱视频| 国产麻豆精品久久一二三| 国产午夜三级一区二区三| 性欧美乱妇高清come| 日本一本在线播放|